ON THE BOOKSHELF
Divorce option potentially less acrimonious than
traditional litigation
By Cathy Frisinger
Star-Telegram Staff Writer
Her detective catches him in a compromising position. His attorney
slaps her with a restraining order preventing her from using their
credit cards. Most of their assets disappear in fees to lawyers,
detectives and therapists for the children, who have been thrown into
turmoil by the bitterness of the feuding between the parents.
Divorce is an ugly process.
Janet Brumley has a suggestion for taking some of the sting out of
the battle that divorce often becomes: Consider collaborative law.
Brumley, a Dallas family law attorney, is the author of Divorce
Without Disaster (Professional Solutions Group, $19.95), a new book
that explains collaborative law divorce, a method that changes the
divorce process from adversarial to joint effort.
"In litigation, we're making both of you as miserable as possible,"
says Brumley. In a collaborative process, "all the decisions are made
together.
"We try to save everything -- we try to save time, we try to save
money, we try to save privacy. The success of the process is both people
getting what they want."
The Texas family code was changed in 2001 to include collaborative
divorce as an alternative to traditional litigation. Brumley says she
has participated in about 50 collaborative law procedures since that
time, all but one successful.
Divorce Without Disaster explains by example, describing what
happens to a fictional couple divorcing with a collaborative law process
and then with traditional litigation. In the back of the book is a list
of Texas family lawyers who have been trained in collaborative law.
Brumley says she finds that her colleagues prefer the new process
once they have experience with it, even though the attorneys wield less
power.
"We all came out of law school wanting to be Atticus Finch. We didn't
want to be hated by society. You offer us a chance to actually do good,
and you're going to win us over."